"Seemed" is not substantive evidence of claims. The Alien Auditor conducts investigations in a manner that can be independently verified by reasonably professional individuals. While not an exhaustive review in all cases, the attached report provides reasonable assurance that the alleged memorandum is both a fabrication and never made it onto the Pentagon's official files website. The Alien Auditor remains impartial to all parties involved and reports facts as understood.
If by Error-Level-Analysis you mean "how many parts of this document weren't debunked by Reddit comments", then sure. That analysis has been performed, but it does not serve as substantive evidence that one document, or either, is legitimate.
The assertion that the alleged memo was originally linked to the Pentagon's website was thoroughly investigated through meta-data analysis and confirmations with third-parties. These tests were structured in a manner to assess key assumptions and reduce bias.
The fact that the "original post" of the referenced memorandum made its way onto Reddit three days after this article's publication is perhaps odder than the fact that there are now two memos, or the fact that both memos contain historical inaccuracies related to the USS Eisenhower.
The Alien Auditor sought to verify these claims and failed to find the original r/ufo post referenced in the imgur repository. Additionally, the Alien Auditor inspected the 1986 Command History of the USS Eisenhower and noted that the vessel was in dry dock at Newport News, VA for the entirety of the calendar year. Through these procedures, the engagement team passes on further testing as the documented naval history of the vessel is inconsistent with the history implied in the alleged memorandum. The referenced command history document can be found below:
This appears to have been posted three days ago, more than a week since the original files release. The memo explored in the article was posted on the same date as the official files release, noted to be May 8th. Based on this updated timeline, it appears the original memorandum was updated to account for factual inconsistencies noted in the article.
The Alien Auditor has no basis to assess the "weirdness" of classifications, having never served in the federal government nor possessing a relevant security clearance. However, it appears more and more likely that this document is indeed fabricated, and further attempts to validate the authenticity of this alleged memo amounts to a fool's errand.
"Seemed" is not substantive evidence of claims. The Alien Auditor conducts investigations in a manner that can be independently verified by reasonably professional individuals. While not an exhaustive review in all cases, the attached report provides reasonable assurance that the alleged memorandum is both a fabrication and never made it onto the Pentagon's official files website. The Alien Auditor remains impartial to all parties involved and reports facts as understood.
If by Error-Level-Analysis you mean "how many parts of this document weren't debunked by Reddit comments", then sure. That analysis has been performed, but it does not serve as substantive evidence that one document, or either, is legitimate.
The assertion that the alleged memo was originally linked to the Pentagon's website was thoroughly investigated through meta-data analysis and confirmations with third-parties. These tests were structured in a manner to assess key assumptions and reduce bias.
The fact that the "original post" of the referenced memorandum made its way onto Reddit three days after this article's publication is perhaps odder than the fact that there are now two memos, or the fact that both memos contain historical inaccuracies related to the USS Eisenhower.
The Alien Auditor sought to verify these claims and failed to find the original r/ufo post referenced in the imgur repository. Additionally, the Alien Auditor inspected the 1986 Command History of the USS Eisenhower and noted that the vessel was in dry dock at Newport News, VA for the entirety of the calendar year. Through these procedures, the engagement team passes on further testing as the documented naval history of the vessel is inconsistent with the history implied in the alleged memorandum. The referenced command history document can be found below:
https://www.history.navy.mil/content/dam/nhhc/research/archives/command-operation-reports/ship-command-operation-reports/d/dwight-d-eisenhower-cvn-69/pdfs/1986.pdf
Thank you for providing the post link.
This appears to have been posted three days ago, more than a week since the original files release. The memo explored in the article was posted on the same date as the official files release, noted to be May 8th. Based on this updated timeline, it appears the original memorandum was updated to account for factual inconsistencies noted in the article.
The Alien Auditor has no basis to assess the "weirdness" of classifications, having never served in the federal government nor possessing a relevant security clearance. However, it appears more and more likely that this document is indeed fabricated, and further attempts to validate the authenticity of this alleged memo amounts to a fool's errand.
No further comments.